This week one of my goal in addition to
my regular ones, was to explicitly talk about the unspoken rules of
classrooms here in Korea. So I started the lesson with a 25 minute
lecture drawing from the Xie reading we did recently. So I drew 5
roughly allegorical class rules from the cultural obstacles Xie talks
about.
- Avoid mistakes.
- Do not disagree with the teacher.
- Don't interrupt the class with your question.
- Be modest.
- Ignore the mistakes of seniors
I talked about how these rules while
useful in some contexts is problematic for a language practice class.
And then I presented what I called “anti-rules” to show what I
would consider useful rules of conduct for our classroom and why.
- Do not avoid mistakes.
- You can express a different opinion.
- You should ask questions in class.
- Express yourself.
- Help seniors with mistakes. (Including the teacher)
I realize that speaking about this
takes time away from class language practice but today I thought it
would be worth the investment of time if students are consciously
aware of cultural differences between Western and Eastern classrooms.
I was also thinking about the culture shock issues we all discussed
in ICC.
So did it make a difference? It's hard
to say. But looking at faces I'm sure a few of them took what I said
to heart. I think that can make all the difference in classes where
the balance of proactive and passive students is close. I have found
that once a class gains a critical mass students one way or the other
it drags all the other students in that direction.
The other activities I did went OK but
I our group work activity was too restrictive. I'm starting to think
that our students may be able to handle more free flowing group
discussions focused more on content rather than form. I plan to make
sure our next group work discussion more like that.
This week I also tried out much more
pair activities following the logic that the more people speaking
simultaneously the better for students. However in my classroom
group work seems to work better for me. Here are the advantages of
group discussion vs pair discussion.
- There is more context with more participants. (More interest)
- There is a higher ability to deal with language problems. (There's a greater chance of peer error correction.)
The only disadvantages I could see is
that each person would have less speaking time. And depending on the
task the group may over rely on a single member to get the “work”
done without processing things themselves. For my students having a
social interest in each other seems to make a big difference to how
they perform.